🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish other types of wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.